image Trilateral Commission
image
image about trilateral membership recent activity publications contact us
feedback

Keeping the Peace in the Post Cold-War Era:
Strengthening Multilateral Peacekeeping

Task Force Report #43
The Trilateral Commission (© 1993)
John Roper, Masashi Nishihara, Olara A. Otunnu and Enid Schoettle
ISBN: 0-930503-70-8

To order: 101 pp./paper/$9.00 plus S&H

To download Portable Document Format (pdf 7.2MB/113pp)

 

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. A Wider Range of Tasks
John Roper
A. The Return of Collective Security and the Expansion of United Nations Tasks
B. Adapting Regional Organizations Centered on Europe
C. The New Challenges of Wider Roles
D. Proposals for the Future
III. Financing UN Peacekeeping
Enid B. Schoettle
A. Current Methods of Financing UN Peacekeeping
B. Current Problems in Financing UN Peacekeeping
- UN Financial Crisis and Peacekeeping
- The Difficulty of Predicting Peacekeeping Costs
- Anomalies in the Special Scale of Assessments
- Voluntary Funding and Collective Financial Responsibility
C. Policy Recommendations
- Policy Recommendations for Trilateral Governments and their Regional Organizations
- Policy Recommendations for Trilateral Governments to Urge on the United Nations
Appendix: Current Methods of Financing the UN
IV. Trilateral Country Roles: Challenges and Opportunities
Masashi Nishihara
A. Full-Fledged Traditional Peacekeepers: Changing Missions, Difficult Issues
- Canada
- European Peacekeepers
B. Self-Restrained Peacekeepers: Between Domestic Constraints and International Pressures
- Germany
- Japan
C. Peace-Enforcers: From UN-Sanctioned to UN-Commanded?
- The United States
- European Peace-Enforcers
D. Promoting Trilateral Cooperation
V. Maintaining Broad Legitimacy for United Nations Action
Olara Otunnu
A. The Role of the Security Council
- Scope of the Mandate
- Decision-Making Process
- Toward Recomposition?
B. Intervention and Legitimacy
- Basic Prerequisites for Intervention
- Emerging Consensus Scenarios for Intervention
- Issue of Feasibility
C. Legitimacy and Sanctions
D. Role of the Secretary-General
E. Public Perception
VI. Summary of Recommendations
Appendix: Current Rapid Expansion Unsustainable Without Major Changes
Marrack Goulding
A. UN Peacekeeping Operations During the Cold War
B. Varied Types of Post-Cold War Operations
C. Steps Needed for Rapid Expansion Not to Undermine Whole Activity

 

Summary

The end of the cold war lifted a central obstacle to the strengthening of multilateral peacekeeping efforts and the extension of multilateral operations beyond traditional peacekeeping tasks. But a number of current operations are faltering. Part of the problem is that public opinion and governments have been calling for additional, ambitious operations without providing the necessary resources or nurturing the structures that can sustain these operations over time. The extension of multilateral operations beyond the traditional UN peacekeeping tasks of the cold war era is also proving to be more complicated and dangerous than some had imagined.

This report address particular aspects of strengthening multilateral peacekeeping. John Roper focuses on the widening range of tasks being organized under the broad umbrella of multilateral peacekeeping, and proposes improvements in arrangements for deploying forces. Enid Schoettle shows that a continuing financial crisis is paralyzing the UN’s ability to carry out its rapidly expanding activities and offers a number of recommendations. Masashi Nishihara suggests ways for trilateral cooperation to make multilateral efforts more effective. Olara Otunnu gives special attention to a “growing disquiet” about the scope, nature, and pace of Security Council decisions, as well as the process of decision-making.

 

Text of Introductory Chapter

The end of the Cold War lifts a central obstacle to the strengthening of multilateral peacekeeping and the extension of multilateral operations beyond traditional peacekeeping tasks. A revived United Nations Security Council and energetic Secretary-General are the global center of this rapidly evolving effort, but the passing of the Cold War also brings other institutions into the picture in different ways. The use of NATO as an executing agent for the United Nations in implementing the “no-fly zone” in Bosnia-Herzegovina is but one remarkable example.

The strengthening of multilateral peacekeeping is in the broad interest of the Trilateral countries. The new era we are all entering is so far one in which disorder is spreading in many corners of the world, and multilateral frameworks, in one way or another, often provide useful frameworks in which to address one or another conflict situation. Beyond particular conflict situations, strengthening multilateral peacekeeping will be important for Trilateral countries in developing post-Cold War cooperation with Russia and China through the United Nations Security Council, and with Russia and other former Soviet republics in frameworks such as NACC (North Atlantic Cooperation Council) and CSCE. It will be of major importance in sustaining and adjusting the security partnership among the Trilateral countries themselves, including adjustments in the roles of Germany and Japan and in the role of the United States.

A number of current peacekeeping operations are faltering. Part of the problem is that public opinion and governments have been calling for additional, ambitious multilateral operations—notably in the framework of the United Nations—without providing the resources and nurturing the structures that can sustain these operations over time. If allowed to continue over time, this gap between what the UN is asked to provide and what it can do could have disastrous consequences for the very multilateral frameworks which Trilateral countries—to which this report is primarily addressed—say they want to strengthen.

The extension of multilateral operations beyond the traditional UN peacekeeping tasks of the Cold War era is also proving to be more complicated and dangerous than some had imagined. United Nations Under-Secretary-General Marrack Goulding, in remarks to the Trilateral Commission annual meeting at which a draft of this report was discussed, set out three conditions that must exist for a proposed peacekeeping operation to succeed: “(1) the mandate or task for the peacekeeping operation must be clear, practicable and accepted by the parties; (2) the parties must pledge themselves to cooperate with the peacekeepers and those pledges must be credible; (3) the Member-States of the United Nations must be ready to provide the human and material resources needed to do the job.” As he also noted, “on any particular day only a minority of the actual or potential conflicts in the world fulfill those conditions.”

In sum, strengthening multilateral peacekeeping in the post-Cold War era will not happen automatically. Strengthening UN and other multilateral frameworks is not a means for Trilateral and other governments to avoid their responsibilities, but rather a useful means in many conflict situations for meeting those responsibilities in a shared manner.

The four central chapters of this report address particular aspects of the challenge. John Roper focuses on the widening range of tasks being organized under the broad rubric of multilateral peacekeeping, and proposes improvements in arrangements for deploying forces. Enid Schoettle’s chapter concentrates on the financing of peacekeeping, and how it should be improved. Masashi Nishihara asks what more particular Trilateral countries can bring to the effort—and what challenges they face in doing so. Olara Otunnu’s chapter is concerned with maintaining the broad legitimacy of United Nations action. A brief final chapter draws together recommendations from the four central chapters and offers a few concluding comments. The address which Marrack Goulding gave to the Commission is published as an appendix.

Authors
(titles at time of publication)

John Roper, Director of the Institute of Security Studies, Western European Union; former Member of the British Parliament and Editor of International Affairs.
Masashi Nishihara, Professor of International Relations, National Defense Academy, Yokosuka.
Olara Otunnu, President, International Peace Academy, New York; former Ambassador to the United Nations; former Foreign Minister of Uganda.
Enid Schoettle, Senior Fellow and Director of the Project on International Organizations and Law, Council on Foreign Relations, New York.